Introduction

Procurement compliance serves as a fundamental pillar that upholds the integrity of the procurement process. Compliance can be viewed from two critical perspectives: process compliance, which ensures the selection of suppliers aligned with the correct set of values, and commercial compliance, which empowers the procurement department with the necessary mandate and negotiation position. In this blog post, we will explore the essence of compliance, the repercussions of its absence, and delve into the strategies that procurement professionals can adopt to ensure compliance is rigorously upheld within their organizations.

Content

This is the first of three blogposts about Compliance.

What is Compliance in Procurement?

Procurement compliance refers to adhering to established policies, regulations, and ethical standards during the entire procurement lifecycle. It encompasses various aspects, including supplier selection, sourcing procedures, contract management, and financial transactions. Compliant procurement practices are not only essential for maintaining transparency and accountability but also contribute to fostering trust among stakeholders and safeguarding an organization’s reputation. Here are five examples of lack of procurement compliance:

1. Non-Competitive Supplier Selection

Example: A procurement officer selects a supplier without conducting a competitive bidding process, opting instead to award the contract to a personal acquaintance or a favored vendor without justifiable reasons.

Impact: This practice undermines the principles of fairness and transparency, potentially leading to higher costs, substandard quality, and accusations of favoritism or corruption.

2. Failure to Adhere to Sourcing Procedures

Example: Ignoring the organization’s established sourcing procedures, such as not obtaining the required number of quotes or failing to conduct a proper needs assessment before purchasing.

Impact: This can result in unnecessary purchases, overpayment for goods and services, and procurement of items that do not meet the organization’s needs or specifications.

3. Improper Contract Management

Example: Not following up on contract terms and conditions, such as delivery schedules, performance metrics, or payment terms. For instance, paying a supplier before confirming the delivery and quality of goods.

Impact: Leads to financial losses, delayed projects, and potential legal disputes due to unfulfilled contract obligations or inadequate supplier performance.

4. Unapproved Financial Transactions

Example: A procurement officer processes payments without obtaining the necessary approvals or exceeds their financial authority limits without proper authorization.

Impact: This can result in financial discrepancies, budget overruns, and possible disciplinary actions against the individuals involved, while also undermining financial controls and accountability.

5. Neglecting Ethical Standards

Example: Accepting gifts or incentives from suppliers in exchange for favorable treatment in the procurement process, such as awarding contracts or selecting them as preferred vendors.

Impact: This compromises the integrity of the procurement process, leads to conflicts of interest, and damages the organization’s reputation, potentially resulting in legal penalties and loss of stakeholder trust.

Each of these examples demonstrates how a lack of procurement compliance can have serious consequences for an organization, highlighting the importance of adhering to established policies, regulations, and ethical standards.

The Consequences of Lack of Compliance

Failure to maintain compliance in procurement can lead to severe consequences for both the organization and its procurement professionals. Let’s explore the implications from the two perspectives:

Process Perspective – Ethical Supplier Selection:

• Reputational Risk: Engaging with suppliers who do not align with the organization’s values can lead to negative publicity, damaging the organization’s reputation in the eyes of customers, investors, and the public.
• Legal and Regulatory Issues: Non-compliance with relevant laws and regulations can result in legal penalties, fines, and potential lawsuits against the organization.
• Compromised Quality: Choosing suppliers solely based on cost, without considering ethical factors, may lead to subpar products or services, negatively impacting the organization’s operations and customer satisfaction.

Commercial Perspective – Mandate and Negotiation Position:

• Loss of Bargaining Power: Lack of compliance may lead to a fragmented supplier base, reducing the organization’s ability to negotiate favorable terms and prices due to weakened leverage.
• Financial Inefficiency: Procurement professionals might struggle to identify cost-saving opportunities and achieve optimal procurement outcomes without adherence to compliance standards.
• Missed Innovation: Ignoring ethical factors in supplier selection may hinder collaboration with innovative and socially responsible suppliers, limiting the organization’s access to cutting-edge products and services.

Assuring Compliance in Procurement

To ensure compliance in the procurement process and enhance the organization’s overall procurement efficiency, the procurement department can adopt the following strategies:

• Robust Supplier Prequalification: Implement a stringent supplier evaluation process that considers not only financial stability and capabilities but also ethical standards, sustainability practices, and alignment with the organization’s values.
• Clear Policies and Procedures: Establish comprehensive procurement policies and procedures that explicitly outline compliance requirements, regulatory guidelines, and ethical expectations.
• Training and Education: Regularly train procurement professionals and key stakeholders on compliance protocols, ethical decision-making, and the significance of supplier diversity and social responsibility.
• Data-Driven Decision Making: Utilize data analytics to assess supplier performance, identify risks, and evaluate compliance adherence, enabling informed decision-making.
• Collaboration with Legal and Compliance Teams: Foster a close working relationship between the procurement department and the organization’s legal and compliance teams to ensure alignment with applicable laws and regulations.
• Ethical Sourcing Initiatives: Encourage and support initiatives for ethical sourcing, such as certifications for sustainable practices or supplier diversity programs.
• Supplier Performance Monitoring: Continuously monitor supplier performance, conduct audits, and engage in constructive feedback sessions to ensure ongoing compliance and improvement.

Conclusion

Compliance in procurement is not merely a box-ticking exercise but a vital element that drives sustainable and responsible business practices. By embracing compliance from both the process and commercial perspectives, procurement professionals can pave the way for selecting ethical suppliers, enhancing negotiation power, and achieving long-term success for their organizations. Upholding compliance standards reinforces the integrity of the procurement process and strengthens relationships with suppliers, stakeholders, and the broader community.

Learn about the agenda of a CPO (Chief Procurement Officer) and key management processes in a Procurement department. How to convert the company strategy to a procurement strategy, content of a procurement strategy, category management and more. Try our Procurement management program.

This blogpost is the first in a serie of three on Compliance: 

1. The Pillars of Procurement Compliance.
2. Understanding Non-Compliance. Stakeholders’ Reluctance
3. Fostering a Compliance-Driven Culture

Note: Illustration to the blogpost “The Pillars of Procurement Compliance” was created by Chat-GPT” on July 22, 2023.

Want more information about LHTS courses in Swedish, visit Utbildning Inköp.