Cost reduction in procurement is not just about trimming expenses—it’s about adding value and bolstering the company’s financial health. As a vital Key Performance Indicator (KPI), cost reduction can be nuanced into two distinct categories: cost avoidance and cost savings. Understanding these concepts, along with their impact on the company’s profit and loss (P/L) statement and balance sheet (B/S), is essential for procurement departments looking to demonstrate value and enhance financial performance.
Content…
Defining Cost Avoidance and Cost Reduction in Procurement
Cost Avoidance refers to actions taken to prevent expenses from occurring in the future. It’s a proactive measure, often less visible on the financial statements, but incredibly significant in reducing potential increased costs. An example is negotiating a contract that locks in current prices, avoiding market-related cost increases over time.
Cost Reduction, on the other hand, involves a tangible decrease in current spending. This direct saving is reflected on the financial statements and may result from renegotiating contracts, consolidating purchases to achieve volume discounts, or switching to lower-cost suppliers without compromising quality.
Calculating Cost Avoidance and Cost Reduction in Procurement
To illustrate, let’s say a procurement department renegotiates a contract for raw materials, securing a price that is 5% lower than the previous year’s cost for the same volume. If last year’s expense was $1,000,000, the new cost would be $950,000, leading to a direct cost saving of $50,000.
For cost avoidance, consider that the market price for these raw materials increased by 3% this year. If the procurement team avoids this increase through their negotiations, they prevent an additional $30,000 in expenses, which would not be directly visible on the P/L but represents a significant avoidance of cost.
Indirect Cost Savings:
Improved Payment Terms
Indirect cost reduction in procurement is subtler but equally impactful. Improving payment terms, for example, can bolster a company’s cash flow and working capital. Extending payment terms from 30 to 60 days for a $500,000 invoice allows the company to utilize that cash for one additional month. This could potentially reduce the need for short-term financing, saving on interest costs.
Other indirect cost savings
Indirect cost savings in procurement are reductions in expenses that are not directly related to the purchase price of goods or services but still contribute to the overall cost efficiency and financial health of an organization. Here are some examples:
- Process Efficiencies: Streamlining procurement processes can save time and resources. For example, implementing an e-procurement system might reduce the need for manual data entry, thereby lowering labor costs and minimizing errors.
- Volume Consolidation: By consolidating purchases to a smaller number of suppliers, a company can reduce shipping and handling costs, administrative overhead, and even receive bulk purchase discounts, leading to indirect savings.
- Inventory Management: Better inventory management can lead to savings by reducing holding costs, minimizing waste from obsolescence, and optimizing stock levels to prevent over-purchasing.
- Energy Efficiency: Purchasing energy-efficient equipment or implementing energy-saving initiatives can result in significant savings on utility bills over time.
- Reduced Travel Costs: Negotiating with suppliers to provide remote troubleshooting support or virtual training sessions can eliminate or reduce the need for travel, leading to savings on transportation, lodging, and associated expenses.
- Quality Improvements: Sourcing higher-quality materials or components can reduce the cost of rework, returns, and warranty claims. Although the upfront cost might be higher, the long-term savings from improved quality can be substantial.
- Sustainability Initiatives: Implementing sustainability practices, such as recycling programs or waste reduction strategies, can lead to savings in disposal costs and possibly earn environmental tax benefits or rebates.
- Supplier Development: Investing in supplier development programs can enhance the supplier’s performance and efficiency, leading to reduced costs for both parties over time.
- Reduced Downtime: Ensuring timely delivery of goods and services can prevent costly production downtime. Working with reliable suppliers to ensure consistent supply can be a significant indirect cost saver.
- Payment Term Negotiation: Apart from extending payment terms, early payment discounts are another way to achieve indirect savings. If cash flow allows, taking advantage of such discounts can lower overall costs.
- Risk Mitigation: By identifying and managing potential risks in the supply chain, a company can avoid unexpected costs associated with supply disruptions, market volatility, and compliance issues.
- Employee Training: Well-trained procurement staff can negotiate better deals, manage supplier relationships more effectively, and recognize cost-saving opportunities, leading to indirect savings across the organization.
- Technology Upgrades: Investing in new technology can seem costly upfront, but over time, the efficiency gains, speed, and error reduction can result in considerable indirect savings.
- Telecommuting Policies: Allowing employees to work from home can save on office space, utilities, and supplies, contributing to indirect cost savings.
- Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Engaging in CSR activities can improve brand reputation, leading to increased customer loyalty and potentially higher sales, which indirectly affects cost savings through increased revenue.
Cost Reduction in Procurement – Impact on Profit/Loss and Balance Sheet
Cost reduction initiatives directly enhance a company’s P/L by decreasing the cost of goods sold (COGS) or operational expenses, thereby boosting net income. Over time, these savings can lead to a stronger bottom line, increased profitability, and potentially more resources for investment or distribution to shareholders.
On the B/S, cost reduction efforts can improve liquidity ratios by increasing current assets or reducing current liabilities, depending on how the savings are utilized. Improved payment terms directly affect the B/S by keeping cash within current assets for a longer period, enhancing the company’s working capital position.
Do Indirect Savings always impact P/L and Balance Sheet.
Reflecting on the nuances of capturing indirect savings and their impact on the P/L and balance sheet is a complex yet intriguing challenge within the procurement discipline. Unlike direct cost savings, which clearly manifest as reduced expenses in financial statements, indirect savings often weave through the organizational tapestry more subtly, yet their influence on financial health is undeniable.
Proving Indirect Savings on the P/L
The Profit and Loss (P/L) statement, which reflects a company’s revenues and expenses over a period, can indeed be influenced by indirect savings, but the connection is not always straightforward. For instance, process efficiencies that reduce labor costs contribute to lower operational expenses, enhancing the operating income reflected on the P/L. However, the attribution of these savings requires a clear link between the procurement initiative and the reduced expense, often necessitating detailed tracking and documentation.
Energy efficiency improvements may decrease utility costs over time, which is another indirect saving evident on the P/L. Yet, the proof often requires a comparison of energy bills before and after the implementation of the initiative, alongside controlling for variables like changes in energy prices or usage patterns.
To demonstrate the influence of improved payment terms on the P/L, one must consider the cost of capital. If extended payment terms allow a company to delay cash outflows without incurring additional interest or fees, the money retained can be used elsewhere to generate income or avoid interest expenses on borrowing, indirectly boosting net income. This scenario hinges on the effective use of that freed-up capital to engage in value-adding activities or cost-avoidance elsewhere.
Proving Indirect Savings on the Balance Sheet
On the balance sheet (B/S), the proof of indirect savings often lies in the company’s improved liquidity and asset management. Inventory optimization, for instance, directly affects the inventory line item on the B/S. A lower inventory level due to efficient procurement practices results in less tied-up capital, potentially improving the current ratio and working capital, which are indicative of financial health.
Similarly, risk mitigation strategies that avoid supply chain disruptions can prevent the need to write down inventory or incur sudden liabilities, maintaining the robustness of the asset and liability columns of the B/S.
Improved payment terms can keep more cash within the business for longer, reflected under current assets. Early payment discounts, if utilized effectively, can reduce the cost of goods sold (COGS), thereby improving the company’s gross margin and retaining more earnings within the equity section of the B/S.
Proving the Impact
The key to “proving” the impact of indirect savings lies in the ability to establish a clear cause-and-effect relationship between procurement actions and financial outcomes. This often requires:
- Baseline Measurements: Having a clear understanding of costs before the implementation of procurement strategies.
- Controlled Analysis: Controlling for external factors that may influence financial outcomes, ensuring changes are attributable to procurement activities.
- Consistent Tracking: Maintaining detailed records over time to track the progression of savings and their reflection in financial statements.
- Cross-functional Collaboration: Working with finance and accounting teams to accurately document and report savings in a way that aligns with financial reporting standards.
- Communication: Effectively communicating the narrative of how procurement initiatives are contributing to financial performance, supported by data.
Ultimately, while it may be challenging to trace the path of indirect savings to specific line items on the P/L and B/S, with diligent tracking, analysis, and collaboration, procurement professionals can indeed prove their value beyond the shadow of doubt. This not only underscores the strategic importance of procurement but also elevates the function to a key player in the financial optimization of an organization.
Summary – Cost Reduction in Procurement explained
Cost reduction as a KPI is a multifaceted concept with direct implications on a company’s financial statements. Procurement professionals must articulate both cost avoidance and cost reduction, appreciating their distinct characteristics and measurement challenges. Moreover, they need to consider indirect cost savings and understand how improved payment terms can positively affect cash flow management.
When executed strategically, cost reduction in procurement initiatives contribute significantly to a company’s financial strength, showcasing procurement’s pivotal role in driving organizational success. Ultimately, these efforts not only display procurement’s contribution to cost management but also its strategic influence on the company’s overall financial health and competitive positioning in the market.
Learn more in the course Sourcing KPI by EFFSO. The course will give you an introduction to Sourcing Key Performance Indicators (KPI) among one is Cost Reduction in Procurement. Also the course will review how to follow up KPIs.
Become introduced to Procurement Management in the bundle: Procurement management program, learn about the agenda of a CPO (Chief Procurement Officer) and key management processes in a Procurement department. How do one convert the company strategy to a procurement strategy, what is the content of a procurement strategy or a category strategy and more….
Note: Illustration to “Cost Reduction in Procurement explained” is created by Chat-GPT on February 11, 2024.
Utbildning inköp will provide information about LHTS courses in Swedish.